A Short Post on Infinity

I was recently asked to write a few paragraphs on the mathematical concept of infinity for a school news letter. I have copied it below. It is indeed brief for the subject that it deals with. I encourage those interested to do additional reading. I especially encourage reading the chapter on infinity in Math through the Eyes of Faith.

tumblr_static_tumblr_lozugqqemn1qjtlm5o1_1280

Infinity is a difficult concept to grasp. We often misuse the term “infinity” to mean “something really, REALLY, big.” When Buzz Lightyear exclaims, “To infinity, and beyond!” the implication is “Let’s go really, really far… and then past that… I guess.” However, when we say that we worship an infinite God, we must be saying more than simply, “God is really, REALLY, big.” So then what are we saying? We can find some insight in mathematics.

To get an idea of infinity in mathematics we have to first be clear on some basic terms and definitions. We can count the numbers in a set by comparing them to the natural numbers (whole, positive numbers). {3,5,7,9} has 4 numbers because we can match each number in this set to the natural numbers 1 through 4: {1->3,2->5,3->7,4->9}. We say this set has size 4. A finite set is any set that can match to the numbers {1,2,3,…,n} where n is some number. An infinite set is a set that is not finite. In other words, there is no stopping point. The natural numbers themselves are infinite: {1,2,3,…}. They just keep going.

Now for some fun.

Consider the even numbers {2,4,6,8,…}. Also infinite. Half as big as the natural numbers right? Wrong. The set of even numbers, which is the set of natural numbers minus the odd numbers, is actually the SAME SIZE as the natural numbers!!! This seems counterintuitive, but we can match each even to the natural numbers {1->2, 2->4, 3->6, 4->8…}. For any even number you can think of, I can give you the natural number it pairs with. We can also prove that the set of all fractions {1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, …, 2/1, 2/2, 2/3, ….} which intuitively seems much bigger than the set of natural numbers, is also the SAME SIZE as the natural numbers.

So is every infinite set the same size? Nope. The set of all real numbers (every decimal expansion) is infinite, but LARGER than the set of natural numbers. This was proven by George Cantor in the late 1800’s. In fact, it has been proven there are infinitely many different sizes of infinity! Try wrapping your brain around that. Cantor spent his whole life working with concepts of infinity… and he went insane… seriously.

So when we say that we worship an infinite God, what are we saying? From a math perspective there are some familiar aspects about infinity, but it is also wholly different than anything we have ever encountered. It seems to follow rules of logic, yet it is surprising and mysterious. A lot of the characteristics of God that may seem paradoxical on the surface (transcendent yet immanent, perfectly just and yet perfectly gracious, one and three) may not be so paradoxical when you are talking about the infinite.

I’m not proposing any answers to questions of faith based on mathematics. It is my hope that you will see how studying math may give us just as much opportunity to reflect on the wonder of God as does a beautiful painting, song, or piece of poetry.

Enjoy pondering the infinite!

[After my initial post, I received another great comment from Scott Eberle that I thought would be worth including in the post itself]

Infinity is such a great subject for exploring the impact of our faith on mathematics!

Yes, Cantor suffered from depression and had multiple mental breakdowns, partly because of the intense opposition to his ideas. But what is really interesting to me is the whole reason he pursued the study of infinity to begin with.

Up until Cantor’s time, Aristotle’s idea that “actual infinity” does not exist was generally accepted by everyone. This was Aristotle’s way of avoiding the seeming paradoxes associated with infinity. Aristotle taught that we could accept “potential infinity”—that we could always keep going out as far as we needed—but that a real, “actual infinity” does not exist; we can never “get there.” And because mathematicians could not figure out how to deal with infinite paradoxes (like there being as many even numbers as whole numbers), Aristotle’s ideas were accepted. A few mathematicians, like Bolzano and Galileo, toyed with attempts to study actual infinity, but without modern set theory, they did not get very far.

Cantor, on the other hand, was a devout believer. He knew that God was infinite and that “actual infinity” must really exist. And because of this deep-seated conviction, he passionately pursued the study of infinity and developed set theory to describe infinite sets in the face of much opposition, especially from Kronecker, one of his teachers. Cantor insisted that his pursuit of infinity was founded on the theological premise that infinity was an attribute of God and that it was right for us to study it. Studying infinity, for Cantor, was a call of God.

At the time, many mathematicians rejected Cantor’s work and there was quite a lot of opposition. Today, virtually all mathematicians accept it, and the set theory he developed is today considered the very foundation for all mathematics. A real story of faith.

Christ is Risen

Christ is risen from the dead
Trampling over death by death
Come awake, come awake!
Come and rise up from the grave

Christ is risen from the dead
We are one with him again
Come awake, come awake!
Come and rise up from the grave

Oh death! Where is your sting?
Oh hell! Where is your victory?
Oh Church! Come stand in the light!
The glory of God has defeated the night!

Oh death! Where is your sting?
Oh hell! Where is your victory?
Oh Church! Come stand in the light!
Our God is not dead, he’s alive! he’s alive!

Mark Your Calendar

Life has been very busy lately, so I thought I would just post a quick blog this week and let you know about some important dates for later this year.

June 1-4: Association of Christians in the Mathematical Sciences Conference, Westmont College

Conference Website

From Bob Brabenec:

This is a preliminary announcement for the 2011 ACMS conference at Westmont College, and a call for papers from the membership.

You may begin submitting abstracts for papers at any time, sending them to the conference coordinator, Russ Howell, at  howell@westmont.edu.  The paper sessions will be on Thursday and Friday afternoons, and will be 15 minutes in length.  There will be parallel sessions, with at least one devoted to computer science papers. Approval of talks will be made by April 1, so you should submit your talks in advance of that deadline.  If space permits, proposed papers will be considered after April 1.

The conference begins with Wednesday dinner, followed by an evening program.  Art Benjamin from Harvey Mudd College will
present a magic show on Wednesday evening and will present a talk on Thursday morning.  Glen Van Brummelen from Quest University is another invited speaker.  Glen usually cannot attend the summer conference because of time conflict with the Canadian Society, so we are very glad he will be with us for one or two talks, and a Q and A discussion session. Our third speaker is Fred Brooks from the CS program at UNC. Fred will present a talk and also offer a Q and A discussion session.  The conference ends with a worship service on Saturday morning.

August 2: Mathematics Through the Eyes of Faith, On Sale

From HarperOne:

This comprehensive work, one of a series cosponsored by the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities, addresses the needs of the Christian student of mathematics to align science and faith. It demonstrates that the study of mathematics penetrates to the core of human existence and has much to contribute to the construction of a consistent Christian worldview.

September 28/29ish: Introducing the Little Mathematician (a.k.a. why life has been so busy lately!)